we are too close
to the end of these sad bad times
to stop moving.
what lives here: science | p.o.v. | poetry |
autobiography |
microfiction | photography | inspiration | tech |
maths | art | music | stuff
some of the things i care about:
my start-up |
education | women's issues / gender equality | healthcare | gov't & politics | planet earth |
While no parent wants a petulant, argumentative teenager, cultivating a skill set for feisty debate in secondary school may be the most effective way to ensure a reasoned adulthood.
Columbia University’s Deanna Kuhn, a psychology professor whose work in cognitive science and education was recently profiled by Miller-McCune (now called Pacific Standard, by the way), worries argument “based on substantive claims, sound reasoning, and relevant evidence” is dying out—yet, in our ever more complex world, is ever more crucial. How, she set out to uncover, could we foster a generation of rational, well-informed citizens to meet the challenges of tomorrow?
Though a geeky staple of secondary education, debate club was not the solution Kuhn investigated. Instead, she went meta. As in, metaphysical.
Washington?
in bed.
(via imgTumble)
I had no idea…. ;)
What’s that?! Debate helps reasoning skills?!?!?!?!
Boom.
Loading posts...